What intrigued me most about When We Were Orphans was a fuzziness that begins with language: Christopher’s voice feels a
bit formal, wordy, and distant, even in suspenseful allegorical action scenes
during the Battle of Shanghai, when he’s trying to reach a house where he
believes his mother is being held. He’s already missed his chance to leave the
country with a woman who’s invited him to run away with her… she’s an orphan,
too, and their attraction is a strange one that seems more predicated on
aloneness than anything else. As Christopher sums up in the book’s last
paragraphs:
But for those like us, our fate is to face the world as orphans, chasing through long years the shadows of vanished parents. There is nothing for it but to try and see through our missions to the end, as best we can, for until we do so, we will be permitted no calm.
Most of the book describes Christopher’s chases after various
shadows: from playing games in Shanghai with his neighbor Akira, a boy from
Japan, to research in London about the Shanghai from which his parents
disappeared, to the on-the-ground search for his mother when he’s an adult.
With those chases comes the creation of personal myths. Those begin in
childhood, too, with Akira touchingly reinventing the kidnappers as people who
“took great care to ensure my father’s comfort and dignity in all our dramas” during
the boys’ role play rescues of Christopher’s father. Christopher describes many
aspects of his friendship with Akira in tremendous detail, including an episode
where they take something from a servant’s room and dialogues in which Akira
calls Christopher “old chap.”
Of course it turns out that not all Christopher’s memories are
quite right—though some are surprisingly helpful—and being sentimental gets a
bad rap toward the end of the book. But memories are transformative for
Christopher, who took on his profession because he felt he had a responsibility
to find justice: he sometimes sounds a little like he thinks of himself as a
loner superhero. He even carries a magnifying glass. And he says detectives
have “little inclination to mingle with one another, let alone with ‘society’
at large.”
Though I enjoyed When
We Were Orphans for the almost ridiculously consistent voice Ishiguro
creates for Christopher, insights into memory (fuzzy or otherwise), and Christopher’s lifelong existential
wanderings, those good technical qualities occasionally made the book feel a little too surgically
correct, too hermetically sealed within Christopher’s mind to be as interesting
as it might have been.
If you’re looking for a straight-ahead international detective novel, you
might want to try D.A. Mishani’s The Missing File,
translated from the original Hebrew by Steven Cohen. Mishani’s police
procedural novel tracks Avraham Avraham’s work on the case of a missing teenage
boy: Avraham is (yet another) heavy-smoking bachelor detective with a
territorial streak, and Mishani also gives him a penchant for watching Law and Order and a passion for
analyzing detective novels. The Missing
File moves along at a decent pace though a detour to Belgium feels a little
like it was pasted in for a very specific reason and I thought a strange
schoolteacher, one of the most developed characters in the book, caught a bit
too much of Mishani’s attention. The novel is absorbing enough though, with some surprises at the end, and the
narrative voice is spare in Cohen’s translation, which generally reads smoothly.
The back cover of my book, by the way, calls Mishani “a literary scholar
specializing in the history of detective literature,” which probably helps
explain some of Avraham’s ideas on solving real-life and fictional crimes.
Up Next: Arnon
Grunberg’s Tirza, a book I think I’d
describe as a combination of “stupendous” and “stupefying.” In a good way. Then
Thorvald Steen’s Lionheart.
Disclaimers: I
received a copy of The Missing File
from publisher HarperCollins, thank you!
No comments:
Post a Comment